Andre Torrez, Notes on “Android Software (Day 3)”
Finishing a significant consumer software application is essentially a process of nailing down a profusion of tiny details like the ones Torrez calls out here. It can seem like death by a thousand paper cuts, and it becomes even more painful when you realize that you can’t market based on polish, and no user will laud you for making sure a button is properly disabled, an icon is perfectly aligned, or a design is properly thought out. One of the hardest things about shipping Birdfeed was staying committed to slaving away on such minutae while other, often less polished, clients beat me to market.
While such attention to detail may not be appreciated in the specific case, however, I’ve found that in aggregate it leads to an overall impression of quality that attracts the kind of fanatically devoted users who form the backbone of a growing, long term user base. Shipping quality is a longer, tougher road than just shipping whatever to be first to market, and its benefits tend to be realized more slowly, but if you want users to love your software as a brand, and not merely use it as a commodity, it’s the only way.
(via buzzandersen via ran-dom)
Comments [0]
Ppppp - thus I checked out some costumes on an unrelated trip to Tarjet today
Comments [1]
Lars and his brother created Google Maps and Google Wave. While I don't know him directly, a couple of my friends are working on Google Wave in Sydney.
Lard held a talk about his startup experiences in Australia which is summarized in this old-school PDF. So have I learned any lessons?Comments [0]
"The good innovation -- the innovation that makes the world a better place and builds real wealth in society -- that stuff is done by radically self-reliant creators who get their hands dirty. Not talkers. Not dreamers. Builders."
-> Read "Build" on Garry Tan's blogComments [0]
"Earlier generations of scientists didn't have to wade through quite as much preexisting work before making an original contribution. Now innovators are establishing themselves much later in life. Over the last century and a half, the average age of a Nobel Prize winner at the moment of his great breakthrough has risen more than five years, from 34 to almost 39 years old. Run-of-the-mill inventors are also older: the average age for registering first major patents has jumped seven months per decade." - Tony Dokoupil
(Saw this in an inflight magazine somewhere)
Comments [1]
Comments [0]